« Idle thoughts while watching the Australian Open for the past 10 days | Home | Bic Pen Cutlery — Episode 3: Are James Rennick and Simon Kingston the Original Designers? »
January 25, 2008
We get email: Just in from Raty Sysavath
In the interest of expediting matters so as to avoid Mr. Sysavath (I don't know why I assume the individual is a man rather than a woman, but I just have this feeling...) having to initiate legal proceedings against Miller Brewing Company, the owner of Sparks (I believe that 7-day clock has already begun ticking as of his email being posted now — not when it was received by me at 12:14:41 p.m. today – though I am sure Mr. Sysavath's crack legal team will argue that the earlier time is in actuality the beginning of the allowed time period for Sparks's response), if you have any information that might prove helpful in answering his query, feel free to contact him directly:
ydoistayhiii@yahoo.com
I'm thinking clifyt, Skipweasel and Flautist especially may be able to shed a little light on this dark (red) corner.
I should note that a rather mischievous tech blogger who shall remain nameless (but her initials are JL, in case you like clues) made me do this: you know how much I hate to cause trouble.
I always knew combining ranching and tech was a recipe for havoc but I had no idea how bad it could really get.
Live and learn.
January 25, 2008 at 01:01 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5dea53ef00e55007b84c8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference We get email: Just in from Raty Sysavath:
Comments
It's all gibberish to me.
Posted by: Skipweasel | Jan 25, 2008 2:14:32 PM
And I thought my readers were idiots! Oh wait, they still are...just a higher class of them (and if they ever follow me over to this site, c'mon...ya'll already know I cain't stand ya'lls!)
Personally, I think he's forgetting to take it out of the can and shoving it in the only hole that fits. No pouring involved. That is why they have the Ribbed For Raty limited edition Sparks.
Posted by: clifyt | Jan 25, 2008 2:00:07 PM
Hmm. I consider it a negative sign when I am mentioned in the same breath, if you will, as ordure.
However, I would ask Mr/Ms Questioner: Into which orifice are you pouring the Sparks?
Oh, all right, I could examine you myself, but I'll need a flashlight, and some textbooks, and some lawyers...
Posted by: Flautist | Jan 25, 2008 1:41:46 PM

